- Columns - Current and Archives
- Looking Back by Jack Lebo - February 2012 >
- Murphy's Law - July 2013>
- Murphy's Law - May 2013
- Murphy's Law - April 2013
- Murphy's Law - March 2013
- Murphy's Law - February 2013
- Murphy's Law - January 2013
- Murphy's Law - December 2012
- Murphy's Law - November 2012
- Murphy's Law - October 2012
- Murphy's Law - September 2012
- Murphy's Law - August 2012
- Murphy's Law - July 2012
- Murphy's Law - June 2012
- Murphy's Law - May 2012
- Murphy's Law - April 2012
- Murphy's Law - March 2012
- Murphy's Law - February 2012
- Murphy's Law - January 2012
- Murphy's Law - December 2011
- Murphy's Law - November 2011
- Murphy's Law - October 2011
- Murphy's Law - September 2011
- Murphy's Law - August 2011
- Murphy's Law - July 2011
- Murphy's Law - June 2011
- Murphy's Law - May 2011
- Your Money Matters by Thomas Sottile - February 2013>
- Taking Care by Lisa Petsche - May 2013>
- Taking Care - April 2013
- Taking Care - March 2013
- Taking Care - February 2013
- Taking Care - January 2013
- Taking Care - December 2012
- Taking Care - November 2012
- Taking Care - October 2012
- Taking Care - September 2012
- Taking Care - August 2012
- Taking Care - July 2012
- Taking Care - June 2012
- Taking Care - May 2012
- Travel Articles
- There's Much To Like About Tybee Island, Georgia
- PA’s Little Town Of Bethlehem Has Giant History, Pleasant Surprises
- Savannah Style: History, Food, Architecture And Even Ghosts
- Vacationing Beats Back Winter
- Visiting The Inn At Pocono Manor
- Delights of Northern Ireland
- Tuscana Resort near Orlando
- Belfast To Commemorate Titanic
- Protect Your Home While Vacationing
- Nearby Hampton Roads, Virginia
- New 'Heritage' Travel Division Formed
- Lifestyle Articles
- PAE-300 ‘Personal Audio Enhancer’ Brings New Sounds And Clarity To Television
- Seniors Desire To Stay In Home Has Led To Innovative Housing
- ‘Pleasantly Plump’ May Not Pose Serious Health Problems After All
- Spring Hills Brings Home Care, Assisted Living to S. Jersey
- Sense Of Family Obligation Remains Strong
- Becoming Bilingual Thought To Delay Onset Of Cognitive Impairment
- Comprehensive Study Provides Foundation For ‘New American Diet’
- Is Alzheimer's A Myth?
- Living Alone, Without Loneliness
- Chocolate In Moderation
- Expert: Forgiveness, Gratitude Are Essential For Healthy Aging
- Expert: No Limit To Length Of Life
- Media-Based Pennsylvania Veterans Museum Is Historic Treasure
- Joint Task: Take Action To Combat Knee Pain
- Want Better Performance From Portfolio? Watch Congress
- Conscientiousness Key To Longevity
- Men, Women 'Retire' Differently
- Sleep Problems And Cognitive Issues
- Newsworthy
- Binge Drinking Is A National Problem — Even With Senior Citizens
- Study Warns Of High Cardiovascular Disease Risks Of Eating Yolks
- Study: 'Old' People Smell Better
- Depression, Anxiety Are Key Factors In Impact Of Parkinson’s Disease
- Study: Don’t Worry, Be Happy For Better Cardiovascular Health
- ‘Chore Connection’ Provides Unique Services, Volunteer Opportunities
- Study Reinforces Benefits Of Regular Colonoscopies
- Study: 'Senior Moments' Begin Earlier
- Three New Studies Suggest Aspirin May Prevent Some Cancers
- No Sure Bet: Seniors Must Recognize Potential Gambling Problems
- Coping With Grief
- New Recommendation Creates Debate Over Prostate Screening
- High Salt, Low Potassium Diet Linked To Increased Death Risk
- Medical Director At HCR ManorCare Receives APPLE Award
- RomneyCare Awful Lot Like Obamacare
- Grandkids Safer With Gram/Pop At Wheel
- AARP: Recession Hits Seniors Hard
- Antidepressants Can Increase Danger of Falling
- Poll: Low Marks For U.S. Healthcare
- More Good News For Coffee Drinkers
- Book Reviews
- We The People
- The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks
- The Love Of My Youth
- The American Way Of Eating
- ‘Rin Tin Tin’
- Pity The Billionaire
- Classic: Uncle Tom's Cabin
- A Stocking Full Of New Christmas Novels
- When China Rules The World
- The Submission - Amy Waldman
- My Soul's Been Psychedelicized
- Reckless Endangerment
- O'Nan's 'Emily Alone'
- Baseball In The Garden Of Eden
- Leisure / Entertainment
- Music - Donald Fagen's 'Eminent Hipster,' Jimi Hendrix Release
- Music - Two CD-Set Features Elvis In Hawaii; Eric Burdon Has New Release
- Music - Billy Joel's 'Love Songs' Set For Release
- Music - Paul Anka Shows Off His Versatility With Compilation CD Of ‘Duets’
- Music - Elvis, Otis Redding Fans Treated To Compilation Sets
- Music - Even At Age 80, Willie Nelson Flaunts Staying Power With Duets Album
- Music - New 63-CD Set Spans Much Of Johnny Cash's Career
- Music - Preservation Jazz Hall Band Celebrates Anniversary
- Music - New Releases Spotlight Garfunkel, Los Lobos
- Music - Television Pioneer Ernie Kovacs Featured In Two New DVD Releases
- Music - Simon’s ‘Graceland’ Album Celebrated With Anniversary Release
- Music - New Releases of Hathaway, Heart Music
- Music - Willie Nelson Still Producing New Music
- Music - New Release of Elvis' Work
- Music - 'The Sound Of Philadelphia'
- Music - Dave Brubeck, Hank Williams Reissues
- Music - Janis Joplin Showcased On 2 New CD Releases
- Music - Paul Simon, Jimi Hendrix Reissues
- Legal Articles
- Adult Children May Be Left To Pay Nursing Home Costs Of Indigent Parents
- Make A Resolution That Provides Long-Term Security
- Dialogue Helps Control And Direct Legal, Financial & Medical Matters
- Life Changes Can Require Revisions, Updates To Estate Plan
- Wills Create Solid Foundation For Effective Estate Planning
- Keep Or Shred? Know What To Do With Personal, Financial Records
- Recent Court Ruling Makes It ‘Open Season’ On Adult Children In PA
- Assuring For Care Of Your Pet
- Reader Resources
- Links To Government and Social Services
- Senior Discounts / bradsdeals.com
- For Advertisers / 2013
- To Subscribe
- Contact Us
- Submitting Letters To The Editor
Recent Court Ruling Makes It
‘Open Season’ On Adult Children In PA
By Linda Anderson, Esq.
Guest Contributor
In 2005, Pennsylvania took a very unusual step in recodifying the filial support law in Pennsylvania under legislation referred to as Act 43. Under Act 43, adult children may be held liable to support their indigent parents.
Until the passage of this unusual statute, it was thought that Pennsylvania, like many states, had abandoned the use of filial support laws to hold adult children liable for parents’ debts. However, a recent Pennsylvania Superior Court decision, HCR vs. Pittas (Pa. Super. Ct., No. 536 EDA 2011, May 7, 2012) paints a chilling picture of the potential scope of authority for adult children under Act 43, leaving many to wonder if it isn’t “Open Season on Adult Children in Pennsylvania.”
In the Pittas decision, an adult son was held liable for his mother’s $93,000 nursing home bill under Act 43. John Pittas’ mother entered a nursing home for rehabilitation following a car crash. She later left the nursing home and moved to Greece, and a large portion of her bills went unpaid. Mr. Pittas’ mother filed an application for Medicaid, which is still pending. But, notwithstanding the pending Medicaid application, the nursing home sued Mr. Pittas for nearly $93,000 under Act 43, which requires a child to provide support for an indigent parent.
The trial court, and then the Pennsylvania Superior Court, concluded that Mr. Pittas, as an adult child, should be held liable for the entire bill, notwithstanding the fact that Medicaid may ultimately be the proper source of payment for the bill or that there were other adult children who may also have some part of the financial burden.
This Act 43 debacle may sound familiar to many in the Philadelphia area who recall The Philadelphia Inquirer article published in July 12, 2009, written by Monica Yant Kinney, entitled “If Mom Can’t Pay, Adult Children Must” which told of a similar Act 43 saga.
Now, after the Pittas decision, it is absolutely vital that parents who may be facing long-term care expenses at home or in a facility obtain advice on how to properly manage those costs. It is important to note in the Pittas case (and many other Act 43 cases), the children who are being sued are not children who have “stolen” money. Rather, many of these cases target adult children who are trying to do the right thing and remain involved in a parent’s care.
In light of this decision, and now the many other cases expected to come from this decision, many seniors and their families may find themselves writing to their state legislators asking why Act 43 was passed in the first place. Good question, since there has always been a body of law that could be used by parents to chase down errant adult children. However, in Pennsylvania there is now a very scary law and this recent decision makes it clear that a parent’s creditors can chase down any one of their responsible, involved, adult children.
By the way, Act 43 also provides that parents may also be held liable for indigent children. Katherine C. Pearson, Law Professor at Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law said it best:
“It is one thing to say that family members have mutual obligations to love and support one another in hard times. That idea is at the core of what it means to be a family. It is quite another thing for Pennsylvania to decide that it will be the ‘leader’ in using the legal system to mandate financial support among family members and to permit third-party creditors to be the plaintiffs. In this case, the Superior Court decision ruled that the son was liable for close to $95,000 in his mother’s prior care expenses, and the court says this ruling is based on the ‘plain language’ of the statute in question. That same ‘plain language’ ruling appears to apply to parents’ responsibility for support of adult children who are unable to be self-supporting. A ‘plain language’ interpretation of the statute means there is no defense for the parent of a lazy child, just as there is no defense for the adult child of an estranged parent. This statute goes both directions. Pennsylvania’s filial support law - as interpreted by the Superior Court on May 7, 2012, in the Pittas case - is changing the game on financial support obligations.”
*
Linda M. Anderson, J.D., LL.M., CELA, practices in the specialized areas of Elder Law, Special Needs Planning, General Estate Planning Estate, and Trust Administration and Veterans Benefits. Linda is also accredited by the Department of Veterans Affairs to assist in the preparation of claims for Aid & Attendance. Further information about Linda and her law firm can be found at www.AndersonElderLaw.com, or by calling 610-566-4700.
‘Open Season’ On Adult Children In PA
By Linda Anderson, Esq.
Guest Contributor
In 2005, Pennsylvania took a very unusual step in recodifying the filial support law in Pennsylvania under legislation referred to as Act 43. Under Act 43, adult children may be held liable to support their indigent parents.
Until the passage of this unusual statute, it was thought that Pennsylvania, like many states, had abandoned the use of filial support laws to hold adult children liable for parents’ debts. However, a recent Pennsylvania Superior Court decision, HCR vs. Pittas (Pa. Super. Ct., No. 536 EDA 2011, May 7, 2012) paints a chilling picture of the potential scope of authority for adult children under Act 43, leaving many to wonder if it isn’t “Open Season on Adult Children in Pennsylvania.”
In the Pittas decision, an adult son was held liable for his mother’s $93,000 nursing home bill under Act 43. John Pittas’ mother entered a nursing home for rehabilitation following a car crash. She later left the nursing home and moved to Greece, and a large portion of her bills went unpaid. Mr. Pittas’ mother filed an application for Medicaid, which is still pending. But, notwithstanding the pending Medicaid application, the nursing home sued Mr. Pittas for nearly $93,000 under Act 43, which requires a child to provide support for an indigent parent.
The trial court, and then the Pennsylvania Superior Court, concluded that Mr. Pittas, as an adult child, should be held liable for the entire bill, notwithstanding the fact that Medicaid may ultimately be the proper source of payment for the bill or that there were other adult children who may also have some part of the financial burden.
This Act 43 debacle may sound familiar to many in the Philadelphia area who recall The Philadelphia Inquirer article published in July 12, 2009, written by Monica Yant Kinney, entitled “If Mom Can’t Pay, Adult Children Must” which told of a similar Act 43 saga.
Now, after the Pittas decision, it is absolutely vital that parents who may be facing long-term care expenses at home or in a facility obtain advice on how to properly manage those costs. It is important to note in the Pittas case (and many other Act 43 cases), the children who are being sued are not children who have “stolen” money. Rather, many of these cases target adult children who are trying to do the right thing and remain involved in a parent’s care.
In light of this decision, and now the many other cases expected to come from this decision, many seniors and their families may find themselves writing to their state legislators asking why Act 43 was passed in the first place. Good question, since there has always been a body of law that could be used by parents to chase down errant adult children. However, in Pennsylvania there is now a very scary law and this recent decision makes it clear that a parent’s creditors can chase down any one of their responsible, involved, adult children.
By the way, Act 43 also provides that parents may also be held liable for indigent children. Katherine C. Pearson, Law Professor at Penn State’s Dickinson School of Law said it best:
“It is one thing to say that family members have mutual obligations to love and support one another in hard times. That idea is at the core of what it means to be a family. It is quite another thing for Pennsylvania to decide that it will be the ‘leader’ in using the legal system to mandate financial support among family members and to permit third-party creditors to be the plaintiffs. In this case, the Superior Court decision ruled that the son was liable for close to $95,000 in his mother’s prior care expenses, and the court says this ruling is based on the ‘plain language’ of the statute in question. That same ‘plain language’ ruling appears to apply to parents’ responsibility for support of adult children who are unable to be self-supporting. A ‘plain language’ interpretation of the statute means there is no defense for the parent of a lazy child, just as there is no defense for the adult child of an estranged parent. This statute goes both directions. Pennsylvania’s filial support law - as interpreted by the Superior Court on May 7, 2012, in the Pittas case - is changing the game on financial support obligations.”
*
Linda M. Anderson, J.D., LL.M., CELA, practices in the specialized areas of Elder Law, Special Needs Planning, General Estate Planning Estate, and Trust Administration and Veterans Benefits. Linda is also accredited by the Department of Veterans Affairs to assist in the preparation of claims for Aid & Attendance. Further information about Linda and her law firm can be found at www.AndersonElderLaw.com, or by calling 610-566-4700.